Satire and Political Caricature/Cartoons
![]() |
Fig 1. George Osborn Robbing the Poor and Disabled. |
![]() |
Fig 2. Labour and their Polices. |
Although for my second
drawing (fig 2) I was influenced more by another’s opinions I felt that it does
have some originality in the way it is clearly and directly picking on a flaw
in Labour’s political party; that I feel, to my knowledge, hasn’t been
addressed directly as yet. One of the things that makes it successful is the
use of familiar visual representation; by matching Ed Milband with a Jehovah Witness
get up sends a message that this man and his polices aren’t to be taken
seriously, particularly as they’re falling all over the place. I feel that by
being a bit cheeky, lightly offensive and finding clever but simplistic ways of
visual drawing attention to political issues I have entered into the mind-set
of a political cartoonist and have understood what it takes for a cartoon to be
effective.
What I learnt
about political cartoons and cartoonist is summarised in this quote: “It (Political
cartoon) is a graphic commentary on what is going on in the world…. The
political cartoonist see them self as a pictorial journalist – a keen
observation of the world…, curious to discover what is going on behind the scenes.
… It is his task both to alert and to keep alert. … (His) aim is to expose
the weakness of society in order to improve it.” [1]
Through further research I learnt the tools and visual
technics that are used to create satire:
·
Caricature – exaggerated appearances to add comedic
effect (Fig 3, Fig 4)
·
Comparison (often extremes) – emphasise
difference for effects (Fig 5)
·
Parody – exaggerated imitation to add comic
effect
·
Distortion – highlight characteristics or
situation to stress an point
·
Anthropomorphism – morphing animal and human characteristics
and behaviour to add humour or portray elements of personality. (Fig 6)
· Shock – graphic violence and horror to grab readers’ attention and to emphasise
seriousness
of a situation. (Fig 7)
![]() |
Fig 3. Isaac
Cruikshank, after Woodward, The humours
of Belvoir Castle- or the Morning After (Fores 1799)
City of Laughter p145 |
![]() |
Fig 4. Gilray, God Save the King – in a Bumper; or- an Evening Scene,
Three Times a Week at Wimbleton (H.Humphrey, 1975)
City of Laughter p.124 |
![]() |
Fig 5 Gilray, Harmony before Matrimony, Matrimony-Harmonics, (H.
Humphrey, 1805)
City of Laughter p.116 |
![]() |
Fig 6. Westminster Gazette, 14th July 1899
20th Century Studies p.31 |
![]() |
Fig 7. Gillray,
Promis’d Horror of the French Invasion, -
or – Forcible Reason for Negotiating a Regicide Peace (H.
Humphrey, 1796)
City of Laughter p.72 |
While researching it was clear to see that throughout the centuries of satire there is a boldness and brashness in the artists’ attitudes towards their work. Nothing is too rude or too offensive. Cartoonists are prepared to rub up the Nazis the wrong way or spark up a terrorist attack. All that matters is challenging public opinion to see a radical world evolving before them; a world that they (the people) can change and influence.
Bibliography
Behrendt, Fritz. 20th Century Studies; Politics
in Cartoon and Caricature. Brighton: Dolphin Press, 1975
Gatrell, Vic. City Of Laughter. New York: Walker & Co.,
2007. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment